Software for law firms and regulated practices.
Case management, document workflows and AI for practices where a missed deadline or a wrong answer has consequences — with audit trails, retention rules and privacy designed in rather than bolted on.
What we do
- Case and matter management
- Every file through defined stages, with the documents each stage requires and the deadlines tracked by the system rather than a calendar.
- Immigration practice
- Programme rules held as data, so a regulatory change is a configuration edit rather than a release, and missing or expiring evidence flagged before the deadline.
- Document automation
- Drafting from approved templates and precedents, with review and approval before anything is sent.
- Governed AI
- Research and drafting assistants that answer from your own sources, check every citation, and leave the decisions with your professionals.
- Compliance checks
- Advertising, anti-spam and conduct rules encoded as checks that run before anything is published or sent.
- Retention and audit
- Retention schedules enforced by the system, and an audit trail on every action taken on a file.
Where it usually hurts
If one of these sounds familiar, it is the kind of problem we are called in for.
- Deadlines are tracked in a calendar and a lawyer’s memory.
- Practice-management software handles billing and contacts, but not the way your files actually move.
- Staff are using public AI tools on client material because there is no approved alternative.
- A programme rule changed, and every template had to be found and edited by hand.
- Nobody can say with confidence which records should already have been destroyed.
Where this experience comes from
Our lead analyst's career history, described by sector — not an Elarion client list. More on the About page.
- A multi-agent assistant for Canadian immigration practice: eligibility scoring and points calculation kept in deterministic code, answers grounded in the legislation, and any answer citing an authority it cannot verify withheld.
- Requirements and functional design in regulated settings — pension administration and public health — where the rules carry legal weight.
Built for regulated practice.
ImmiCase holds programme rules as data and flags missing or expiring evidence before the deadline. KriftAI enforces advertising and anti-spam rules as a hard gate before anything is published.
Questions buyers ask
- Should we use a practice-management product like Clio, or build?
- Use one for what it does well — billing, contacts, calendars. Build where your files follow rules the product does not model: programme-specific evidence, multi-stage reviews, or deadlines that depend on the matter. The two can be integrated.
- Is AI safe to use in legal practice?
- Not as a general-purpose chatbot on client material. It can be made safe enough for defined tasks: answers grounded in approved sources, citations checked, client data kept out where it is not needed, and a professional approving anything that leaves the firm.
- Where is our data stored?
- Where your obligations require it. Hosting region, retention and access are decided in the specification, not left to a default.
Further reading
- Using AI in a law firm or regulated practice without taking on the liabilityThe question is not whether AI is useful to a regulated practice.
- Privacy by design for custom software in CanadaPrivacy obligations are much cheaper to meet in the specification than in a finished system.
Related services
Running a practice on calendars and memory?
30 minutes, free. Bring the problem, or the change you already have in mind.